Carroll’s Three-Stratum Theory of Intelligence

By the late twentieth century, intelligence research had accumulated an awkward abundance of results. Spearman had identified general covariance.

By the late twentieth century, intelligence research had accumulated an awkward abundance of results. Spearman had identified general covariance.

Knowing that intelligence contains broad abilities creates a new question: **what kind of abilities are they, and why do they develop differently?

Once psychologists began taking general intelligence seriously, another problem became harder to ignore.

At the beginning of the twentieth century, psychologists faced an intriguing pattern. Measures that seemed to test quite different mental abilities tended to correlate.

Give a large group of people a sufficiently varied set of cognitive tests: reasoning, vocabulary, memory, spatial problems, processing speed.

A standard score turns raw performance into a common scale so that a result can be interpreted relative to a reference distribution.

An IQ percentile describes relative standing in a norm group. It is not the percentage of questions answered correctly and not the percentage of intelligence a person possesses.

“Average” is not a kind of person. It is a position within a reference distribution created by comparing performance with an appropriate norm group.

People can change substantially while their relative standing compared with others becomes increasingly stable. Those are not contradictory facts.

Intelligence can help a person reason well. Wisdom asks a different question: how well is judgment used when values, uncertainty, other people and the consequences of action matter?